Trump's War On Drugs: Unpacking the impact on Venezuela's drug trade.

Caesar Rondina, Author | Public Speaker
1 day ago
21 min read

ANNOUNCEMENT:

I've received multiple requests in 2025 to reschedule the publication of my blog post to a later time so people can unwind from their day and not miss a post.

Starting February 2nd, the link to my blog posts will be posted on all my social media sites at 8:00 PM EST. The email with the link will go out to our family of subscribers at 7:45 PM EST.

As a reminder, anyone can view any post, past or present, by going to www.caesarrondinaauthor.com

and selecting "Author's Pen Blog" from the main menu.

'Thank You.

INTRODUCTION: Trump's War on Drugs - Unpacking the impact on Venezuela's drug trade.

Greetings. I often receive requests to discuss the drug crisis in our country. Anyone who has read the "About The Author" section on my website knows I worked as a career firefighter/paramedic for a combined total of 36 years. That may not qualify me as an expert on drugs, but it certainly qualifies me as an expert in seeing the effects it has had on individuals and families. As a retired firefighter and paramedic, I have seen firsthand the death that drug overdoses have brought to numerous individuals of all ages, and the impact it has on the families and friends of the victims who these tragedies have struck. Many may have family members or friends presently suffering from various forms of drug addiction, which can also lead to the same end result.

It is well known that 'the system' has needed help in managing this crisis and creating more resources for decades. In 2018, during his first term, President Trump allocated more resources to combat this problem within our system, as have other administrations. Has it been enough? My guess is it hasn't since the drug crisis and influx of illegal drugs have worsened each year. Each year, more of our citizens die from drug overdoses, and more individuals develop a drug habit and become addicted, often times starting at a young age, not counting the mental behavioral issues this addiction leads to. How, or can we, effectively address this problem?

We can get better at it, but the reality is, without better and earlier education, better programs, both pre- and post-addition, along with firm actions taken to decrease the influx of drugs into and within our country, no administration can eliminate the problem. At least not yet. We can try to reduce it, make the recovery stage more efficient, but illegal drugs enter our country through many sources. The best we can hope for is to reduce the influx of illegal drugs into our country significantly. This is the only way to gain some form of control over the amount of drugs coming into our country, and even then, some will creep through.

The best method is through proper education at a young age. In itself, that is a massive and expensive undertaking. The second primary task is helping those who are addicted recover from this terrible addiction, which may be the more difficult task. Based on my experience in the medical system, I believe we lack sufficient resources to do this effectively. Too many times, I have seen individuals enter a drug or alcohol program, come out clean, and return to the environment that put them there in the first place. Hence, the cycle repeats itself. Why? Because we do not have adequate funding or post-care programs to help everyone. Basically, the system is overwhelmed and overloaded with patients. This is a multifaceted problem that also affects the mental health system, and these forms of abuse lead to further mental health problems.

Look at it this way. If you have a 5-gallon bucket that can bail out 100 gallons of water per minute, but 200 gallons per minute are leaking in, simple math shows you cannot keep up with the influx. Everything backs up until someone drowns. On the surface, the fix is simple. Get a larger bucket, or multiple buckets, to do the job at the same time. However, life is not that simple, and the fixes aren't cheap.

The war on drugs has long been a contentious issue, with varying strategies employed across numerous administrations. Under President Donald Trump, this initiative took on a distinctive focus regarding Venezuela, a country deeply embroiled in a multifaceted crisis, including drug trafficking, and has been for years. The central question arises: How did Trump's war on drugs shape U.S. relations with Venezuela, and what were its implications? I want to focus on Venezuela in this post because that is what the world is focused on, especially in light of the more recent focused actions and the recent bombings in Venezuela and the capture of its President, Nicholas Maduro, and his wife.

Trump's administration views Venezuela as a significant drug trafficking hub, often linking its government to narcotics and corruption, and it is. This assertion was used to justify increased diplomatic and economic pressure on the Venezuelan regime. Trump's approach reflected a combination of aggressive rhetoric and sanctions aimed at curbing drug-related activities spearheaded by figures within the Venezuelan government. However, that was not enough. Drugs are a money-driven business, run by money-driven individuals. Loss of life does not matter to these people.

Before we begin, I have heard arguments from all sides about the present tactics being used. However, I wonder how anyone would feel if their child or loved one were a victim of a drug overdose that resulted in death? Death is final. You cannot fix it, and there is no coming back from it. In our country, well over 100,000 individuals die each year from numerous forms of drug overdoses, and most of these are younger individuals. These are human beings, our fellow citizens, family members, and friends, who had their whole life ahead of them and have lost it. I have pronounced people dead on scene from a drug overdose far more times than I choose to remember. However, it is hard to forget. It is hard to unsee what you have seen. Not only the physical presentation of a deceased individual, but also the effects it had on others.

If you are the type who sits in front of your TV watching the news and have never been directly affected by this, and you think you have the luxury to judge what others do to try to fix this problem. I am happy for you. Maybe you cannot handle the reality of the problem. Therefore, let me give you a small taste of reality. The reality I have seen and been a direct part of.

From the twisted and mutilated bodies of teenagers I have had to pull out of a horrific car wreck due to alcohol or drug abuse, not counting the innocent people that wreck also affected, to the youth adult who passed out on the dance floor of a nightclub, to the finding the body of someone who hasn't been heard from for days or weeks in their apartment and are now deceased, I have seen it all. I can tell you with 100% certainty that if I haven't seen it, it is only because it hasn't happened yet. What I have seen and what others in my previous profession have seen can only be described as horrific and life-changing.

IT WAS NEVER EASY, AND IT NEVER GOT EASIER, AND THE MEMORIES HAUNT YOU FOREVER! Whether you are a doctor, a nurse, a police officer, or a first responder, you NEVER GET USED TO IT. YES! This topic is dear to my heart. I have been retired from being a paramedic for 6 years, and to this day, I can still see the faces of each of them. Most paramedics keep track of certain numbers. During my career as a paramedic, I cared for 76,251 patients, saved many lives, and delivered 13 babies. I choose not to keep track of the number of people I had to pronounce deceased, but to this day, I can still remember their faces, and the faces of family members when I had to tell them their loved one has passed away, and there was nothing I could do to save them or bring them back to life to return them to their families.

If you have never done this for a living, I don't expect you to understand what it is like to make a dead body look presentable for a family member to see while you sit and wait with the family and try to console them until the coroner, police, or medical examiner comes to take the body so a funeral home can assume control and try to reassemble a broken life, providing an autopsy doesn't have to be done first.

At this point, there is nothing more you can do for the deceased; therefore, your focus must shift to caring for the family members. I have seen a family member develop an acute medical event from the grief and stress that needed to be cared for, which compounded the sadness of the event. Imagine seeing your teenage son or daughter dead on the floor of their bedroom after being dead for days or weeks. How do you think you would react? This is reality, which happens every day in the real world.

You hear the stories on the news, but you don't see the pictures, the individuals, or the trauma that comes with the story. You don't see the people; therefore, you miss the reality. My heart cries out for these families, yet I am grateful that many do not have to deal with this. However, it is a growing problem that needs to be addressed. Therefore, please use caution when judging those who are taking measures to stop these tragedies. If this reality has not painted the picture of how advanced our drug problem is in this country, nothing will, and your own ignorance is stopping you from realizing it. Let's move on.

LET'S ANALYZE TRUMP'S APPROACH TO VENEZUELA:

Identification of Venezuela as a Threat: The Trump administration consistently labeled Venezuela a threat to U.S. national security. This identification was critical in justifying proposed strategies.
Sanctions on Officials: Specific Venezuelan officials were sanctioned based on their alleged involvement in the narcotics trade, offering a way to weaken the Maduro regime and cut off resources.
Military Presence and Partnerships: Increased military presence in the region and partnerships with neighboring countries aimed at countering drug trafficking routes that passed through Venezuela were marked by enhanced collaboration with Colombia.
Heightened Rhetoric: Trump's administration utilized aggressive rhetoric to demonize the Venezuelan government, linking it to broader issues such as terrorism and drug trafficking, which served to rally support among domestic audiences.
Foreign Policy Realignment: U.S. foreign policy shifted toward a unilateral approach, emphasizing sanctions over diplomacy and focusing on regime change as a way to resolve issues rooted in drug trafficking.

Real-World Applications: The Sanction Regime

One of the most concrete steps taken by Trump's administration was the imposition of sanctions on Venezuelan officials. These sanctions were aimed at high-ranking members of the Venezuelan military and government, such as Nicolás Maduro, Diosdado Cabello, and others, claiming they were deeply involved in drug-smuggling operations.

Example:

In March 2020, the U.S. Department of Justice announced rewards for information leading to the capture of these officials. Offering $15 million for Maduro's arrest underscored the U.S. willingness to use its financial leverage to deal with the alleged drug ties.

Understanding the Landscape:

Stay Informed on Policy Changes: Regular updates on U.S. foreign policy can unveil shifts in strategy that may affect drug trafficking operations and international relations.
Monitor Regional Developments: Understanding the geopolitical dynamics surrounding Venezuela, especially concerning Colombia and Brazil, can provide insights into traffickers' methods and the impact of U.S. policies.
Educate about Drug Trafficking Channels: Knowledge of the narcotics trade routes, especially those running through Venezuela, is essential for comprehending the complexities involved in U.S. drug policy.

Pros and Cons of the Strategy:

Pros:

Weakening of Drug Traffickers: By targeting high-ranking officials, the potential for disrupting the drug trade is significant. These actions can lead to dismantling networks.
International Support: The strategy potentially solidified partnerships with countries affected by drug trafficking, such as Colombia, fostering collaborative governance efforts.
Raising Awareness: Trump's administration advanced a narrative linking drugs to national security threats, thereby bringing attention to an often-ignored issue in international relations.

Cons:

Escalation of Conflict: Targeting officials can further destabilize Venezuela, aggravating the humanitarian situation without facilitating genuine change.
Limited Success: While sanctions can be effective, many officials remained in power, thereby mitigating their impact on the narcotics trade.
Global Implications: Such unilateral actions have potential implications for global drug policy, emphasizing a need for multilateral cooperation that could be sacrificed for immediate U.S. interests.

EFFECTIVE WAY FOR ADDRESSING DRUG TRAFFICKING IN VENEZUELA:

Emphasize Multilateral Cooperation:

A collaborative effort involving regional partners can enhance the effectiveness of drug prevention strategies. Involving multilateral organizations helps address structural problems. Countries in the region should establish binders of joint operations and intelligence-sharing initiatives to combat drug trafficking collectively.

Enhance Domestic Law Enforcement Capabilities:

Strengthening law enforcement in both the U.S. and Venezuela can create a more effective front against drug trafficking. Invest in training programs adapted to local law enforcement needs, emphasizing understanding complex networks of drug trafficking.

Prioritize Humanitarian Solutions:

Balancing punitive measures with humanitarian aid can alleviate some of the hardships faced by the Venezuelan population, fostering a more stable environment conducive to tackling drug-related issues.

Develop policies that allocate funds specifically to humanitarian assistance, ensuring aid reaches the most affected areas without interference from corrupt officials.

Potential Pitfalls of Existing Strategies:

While Trump's strategy demonstrated a decisive stance against narcotics, several pitfalls warrant attention.

Over-reliance on Sanctions: Restrictive measures can lead to economic suffering without substantially impacting drug-related activities. This long-term strain may bolster grassroots movements supporting the Maduro regime instead of undermining it.
Limited Engagement with the Population: Aggressive tactics could alienate the Venezuelan public, leading them to resist U.S. efforts and support their government instead.
Flexibility in Policy Adoption: A rigid approach limits the U.S. ability to adapt to changing situations within Venezuela and surrounding nations, potentially leading to unforeseen consequences.

IMPACTS ON HUMANITARIAN ISSUES:

The hyper-focus on drug trafficking as part of international relations can overshadow critical humanitarian concerns. The situation facing millions in Venezuela remains dire, with struggles for basic necessities such as food, water, and restrictions and hardships faced by migrants fleeing the crisis, sharply contrasted with the aggressive posture against the drug trade, often resulting in isolated and vulnerable populations.

Additional Strategies Moving Forward

Focus on Root Causes: Addressing the underlying economic and social issues leading to drug trafficking is essential for sustainable change. The Trump administration's policies often neglected this broader understanding.
Balancing Hard and Soft Power: Incorporating soft power strategies, including diplomacy and development aid, could nurture relationships with the Venezuelan populace, mitigating the effects of drug-related policies.
Continuous Assessment of Drug Policy: Regular evaluations of drug enforcement efforts and their consequences will ensure a more adaptable and responsive approach to combating drug trafficking.
Leaders In Any Country: Having leaders in Venezuela or any country who are running the government must be committed to ending the drug trafficking in their country.

THE CONTROVERSY:

The most significant controversy in today's situation on the war on drugs with Venezuela is the destruction of boats carrying drugs. As always, there are always two or more opinions on any issue. However, a leader, regardless of name, MUST choose what is best for the country and its citizens as a whole—not based on the views of any individual or group. Saving the lives of our citizens is not and should never be political.

Issues escalate when sanctions, diplomacy, and other means fail to solve the problem. In recent years, the fight against drug trafficking has become a focal point of national and international policy discussions, particularly under President Donald Trump's administration during his first term, and in his present term. One of the more contentious measures proposed during this period was the directive to destroy boats suspected of carrying illegal drugs. That was a start.

Drug trafficking has long been a pervasive issue in the United States, affecting communities and contributing to widespread addiction problems. Authorities estimate that billions of dollars worth of illegal narcotics enter the country each year, with extensive networks involving land, air, and sea routes. The Caribbean and Central American regions, in particular, have become hotspots for drug runners using boats to transport illicit substances across borders. To combat this, Trump's administration proposed more aggressive tactics, including the destruction of vessels CONFIRMED to be involved in drug smuggling. There is the keyword. CONFIRMED. This initiative aimed to deter trafficking operations by eliminating the physical means of transport. However, this approach brought forth significant legal, ethical, and practical controversies.

THE RATIONALE BEHIND THE INITIATIVE:

Supporters of the initiative argued that decisive action was necessary to combat the growing tide of drug-related violence and addiction. Proponents believed that destroying the boats would send a strong message to traffickers, potentially disrupting their operations and curbing the flow of illegal drugs into the U.S. They cited historical precedents where aggressive measures were taken in law enforcement and military contexts to deter criminal activities.

Furthermore, the initiative was framed as part of a broader strategy to protect public health, reduce drug-related violence, and reinforce national security. By focusing on the maritime routes often used by traffickers, the administration hoped to take a proactive stance in the ongoing battle against drug smuggling. Despite these justifications, the proposal drew sharp criticism from various quarters. Critics raised several ethical and legal objections to the destruction of boats.

Many argued that destroying vessels in international waters could constitute a violation of international maritime law, which is designed to protect the rights of vessels regardless of their cargo. Critics raised concerns that this approach might lead to diplomatic tensions with other nations, particularly if civilian vessels were mistakenly destroyed or if the act were seen as an Act of War.

Another significant worry was the risk of harming innocent lives. Many boats operating in these waters may not be involved in drug trafficking; indeed, they could be fishing vessels or even pleasure boats. The potential for collateral damage raised alarms among human rights advocates, who cautioned that such actions could result in tragic events and loss of life.

Skeptics also questioned the effectiveness of this drastic measure in curbing drug trafficking. Some experts argued that destroying boats might only lead traffickers to use alternative methods, such as consolidating their shipments or investing in more concealed means of transportation. The costs associated with this strategy, including the risk of legal backlash and the potential for international confrontation, led some to view the proposal as more symbolic than practical.

As with most policies from the Trump administration, the destruction of drug-running boats generated intense political division. Supporters within the political framework hailed the move as a necessary and uncompromising stance on crime. At the same time, opponents lambasted it as reckless and indicative of an overzealous approach to drug enforcement.

Public opinion regarding the initiative was similarly divided. Polls reflected that while some sections of the population were supportive of aggressive anti-drug measures, many were concerned about the implications of such a warlike strategy. Advocacy groups, especially those focused on human rights and maritime safety, strongly opposed the measure, organizing campaigns to raise awareness of the issue.

A COMPLEX CHALLENGE:

The controversy surrounding Trump's initiative to destroy boats carrying drugs underscores the complexity involved in formulating effective drug policy. At the same time, the intent behind the proposal was to curb a pressing societal issue; the ethical, legal, and practical implications raised essential questions about the means used to achieve such goals.

As the United States continues to grapple with drug trafficking and its associated challenges, it is clear that any proposed solution must carefully balance enforcement with respect for legal and ethical standards. The discourse initiated by this initiative is likely to influence future approaches to drug policy, shaping the conversation on how best to protect public health and safety while upholding principles of justice and human rights, a line that is often thin.

COMMON ISSUES IN TRUMP'S WAR ON DRUGS WITH VENEZUELA:

Supply Chain Disruptions

A significant issue impacting the effectiveness of Trump's war on drugs in Venezuela has been the disruption of supply chains for narcotics. For instance, in early 2020, the U.S. Department of Justice reported that the seizure of cocaine shipments from Venezuela had decreased, indicating a potential shift in distribution methods. To address this, U.S. agencies have collaborated with Colombia to enhance intelligence sharing, enabling law enforcement to identify and intercept emerging trafficking routes. Agents in the region have utilized satellite imaging and drone technology to monitor remote jungle areas where traffickers might be operating.

Corruption within Law Enforcement

Corruption within Venezuelan law enforcement has posed a significant challenge to eradicating drug trafficking. Reports from 2018 highlighted systemic bribery, with evidence that some police officials were complicit in the operations of drug cartels. To combat this, the U.S. implemented training programs to build the integrity of law enforcement personnel. By establishing whistleblower protections and creating a reward system for reporting corruption, the U.S. aimed to incentivize honest practices among Venezuelan law enforcement.

Impact on Local Communities

The war on drugs has had unintended consequences on local communities in Venezuela, such as increased violence and displacement. A 2019 study indicated that clashes between rival gangs over control of drug routes led to civilian casualties in Caracas. To address community safety, the U.S. partnered with NGOs to create community safety initiatives. These programs focus on providing at-risk youth with educational and employment opportunities, reducing their likelihood of being recruited by gangs involved in drug trafficking.

Resistance from the Venezuelan Government

Efforts to dismantle drug trafficking networks often face resistance from the Venezuelan government, which has been accused of facilitating the drug trade for financial gain. A concrete example occurred in 2020 when the Maduro administration publicly rejected U.S. extradition requests for key cartel figures. In response, U.S. officials have shifted their strategies to include diplomatic pressure. By leveraging international coalitions and sanctions, the U.S. seeks to isolate the Maduro regime economically and diplomatically, reducing its capacity to support drug trafficking operations.

International Collaboration

An ongoing issue is the need for synchronized international efforts against drug trafficking. In 2021, a significant cocaine cartel was discovered operating between Venezuela, the Caribbean, and the United States, revealing a lack of coordination among the involved nations. To improve this, the U.S. facilitated multilateral meetings with Colombia, Brazil, and European countries to streamline counter-narcotics efforts. This collaboration has led to joint operations in which intelligence and resources are shared, enhancing these countries' overall effectiveness in monitoring and dismantling drug networks.

Evolving Trafficking Methods

The adaptability of drug traffickers presents a constant challenge. During 2022, law enforcement agencies noted a shift towards the use of advanced technologies, such as encrypted communication apps and drones for transporting drugs, complicating interception efforts. To counter these evolving methods, the U.S. has invested in training for intelligence agencies on recognizing and responding to new trafficking techniques. Additionally, the development of cybersecurity measures has become a priority for detecting and disrupting the digital infrastructure of trafficking organizations.

AUTHOR'S OPINION: More advanced initiatives.

In every situation, there comes a point where, if all attempts fail, more aggressive measures may be required, especially when national security and the health and well-being of our citizens are at stake. Often, these choices are unpopular. Especially given the political tension in today's environment. The truth is, the individuals involved in drug trafficking know the risks they are taking and choose to take those risks to make billions of dollars. Billions of dollars of profit they know is killing other individuals, not only in our country, but globally as well. Therefore, this problem is not limited to the United States; this is a global problem.

This is the choice they have consciously and willingly made. No one forces them to get involved with the actions they take or the methods they use to sell drugs and traffic them globally. Hence, for every action, there is a reaction. When you do not like the reaction and fail to take measures to change your actions, then you must be prepared to pay the price for what you do, and make no mistake. There is a price to pay for anything anyone does.

As tragic as any loss of life is, the number of lives lost in the actions the Trump administration has taken is the smallest fraction compared to the number of lives being lost each year to illegal drugs coming into our country. At some point, our leadership and other leaders must take a stand and send a clear message that our governments will not tolerate this. President Trump is doing precisely that. I do not blame this administration for its actions; I applaud it. Also, this is not about Trump. I would applaud any administration that took definitive measures to stop this drug trafficking problem. It is the politicians against Trump who attack these methods.

I blame any government that continues and refuses to correct its illegal actions; as such, they need to be held accountable. As a nation, we must make it clear what we are willing to tolerate and what we are not, leaving no room for doubt. To that end, it is not negotiable. How and when this will end lies in the choices made by the Venezuelan government and its people. I can honestly state that any mother, father, or family member who lost a child to a drug overdose, especially those I have had direct contact with throughout my career as a paramedic, would probably agree with my opinion.

That said, I might disagree with other views, but I respect others' rights to have their own opinions because I know they probably have not seen or experienced what I have. Oftentimes, reality doesn't seem real until it smacks you right in the face. As always, each side will try to find or twist a legal reason why something was legal or not. I expect that. However, if we had a political environment in which both sides of the aisle worked together for the common good, those arguments would not have to be made.

IN CLOSING:

Trump's approach to the war on drugs, particularly in relation to Venezuela, reflects complex domestic and international policy challenges, some of which have taken on more direct measures in the form of military actions. By leveraging sanctions and diplomatic pressure, the administration aimed to curb the flow of illegal drugs entering the United States. It is always a shame when diplomatic measures are not enough.

Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro and his wife, Cilia Flores, were captured by U.S. forces on

January 3, 2026, during a large-scale military operation in Caracas. Following his indictment on drug trafficking charges, he and his wife were flown to New York to face charges. Over 150 U.S. aircraft from numerous airbases participated, bombing infrastructure to disable defenses as a special forces unit targeted Maduro's residence. Many critics have their opinions regarding this action. Congress feels this action requires congressional approval. Let the legalminds battle that out.

President Trump claims this was not an act of war but a law-enforcement operation under Article 51 of the UN Charter. I am sure the debate over this issue will continue for some time. However, this strategy has also raised significant concerns about its effectiveness, implications for human rights, and potential unintended consequences. The Senate wants to limit the President's ability to make certain decisions. In many cases, that should apply. Not in this case.

As the situation continues to evolve, future policymakers must balance aggressive drug enforcement measures with thoughtful engagement and support for sustainable development in affected regions. This can only occur through a comprehensive, cooperative approach by all governments. With this approach and cooperation, can we hope to address the multifaceted issues surrounding drug trafficking and its underlying causes?

Keep this in mind. Sometimes, to reach an end goal, more drastic measures are needed. It is easy to watch the news and hear about what is going on around the world. It is easy to pick a side when you listen to all the biased reporting. The end result is a sad yet minimal effect on the viewer. Nothing seems real when you see it on TV because you aren't there to see it or experience it firsthand. Ask a service member who has been to war, or a firefighter caught in a fire, or a police officer being shot at. However, when it shows up in your own backyard, it affects you directly. It is no longer a news report because things just got real.

A final note on reality. As a firefighter and paramedic, I or any other individual in that profession is NOT allowed to carry weapons, tasers, or any other forms of self-defense. Why? Because we are the good guys, the ones who are there to help others who are injured. We shouldn't need them. However, I worked during the times of some of the worst gang riots in the area where I worked.

I wore a bulletproof vest because I've been shot at, jumped by gang members, attacked with knives, and fought many times to protect my own life while trying to help others. Thank God for all the dedicated police officers who go unnoticed, who were there to help. I had 13 surgeries from job-related injuries sustained while performing my job throughout my career. There are many more still out on the streets doing that job. Why, because they care. It is certainly not for the money it pays. Let's not take aim at an administration that also cares, because when the caring is gone, so is life as we know it. That, my friends, is reality.

No one is looking for sympathy or thanks. We all know what we signed up for and the risks associated with our jobs. We all do it willingly. Every safety precaution is taken, but you can never plan for every situation that could get out of hand at any given moment, and when you least expect it. What should have been a routine medical call, fire, or traffic stop can turn against you without notice, at any time. Those are the risks. It's what you train for, and that is reality.

So when you ask yourself why first responders or military service personnel are such a close-knit group of individuals, even across different services and agencies, it is because each of them knows that their life, at any time, can hang in the balance, and in the hands of another just like you. You know you are never alone, or alone for long, and someone will come to help you. NO MATTER WHAT THE ODDS, NO MATTER WHAT THE COST, and believing in God is what keeps you going. God bless you all.

I hope you enjoyed my blog post. Since you're here, subscribe to my blog and never miss a post. All it takes is an email address. We never sell or share our email list. Your privacy is paramount. You will never receive emails from ads or advertisers. You only receive an email when a blog is posted. We would love to have you join our family of subscribers. Click this link to SUBSCRIBE. Please feel free to browse the remainder of the website.

I also invite you to subscribe to my YouTube or Vimeo channel, and you can follow me on Facebook, LinkedIn, Instagram, Truth Social, and "X" (Formerly Twitter) by clicking any of my social media links at the bottom of any page.

Comments are always welcome. If you would like me to discuss a topic or have any questions regarding a post, please email me at crondina@caesarrondinaauthor.com. I accept guest blog posts. If you wish to write an article on a topic, email your finished draft in editable Word format to crondina@caesarrondinaauthor.com. I will review your article and get back to you.